News
Local woman files discrimination complaint after being turned away at the Canadian border
Email this story | Print this story
Friday, May 8, 2009 10:25 PM EDT

Rose Kelly sits with her children Xander Hildendorf, 5, left, and Onyx Kelly, 1, in their Owosso apartment. Argus-Press Photo by Anthony Cepak
OWOSSO - An Owosso woman says she was recently denied permission to cross the Canadian border because she is on welfare.
Rose Kelley, 25, said she was trying to visit friends and family who live in Canada, but ran into many complications on the way.
She arrived at the Sarnia, Ontario, border May 1 with her children Xander, 5, and Onyx, 1. When she reached the customs and immigration office she was given a list of items she needed to cross the border - some of which included: evidence of citizenship, financial support, financial assistance, confirmed means of departure, and more.
Before leaving home on May 1, Kelley said, she contacted the Canada Border Services Agency, and was told she only needed to bring identification and papers proving she had full custody of her children.
Because of this, she had to travel back to Owosso to get the necessary papers and then return May 3.
“I brought everything. My entire folder had every piece of paperwork that they could ask for,” Kelley said.
However, she was once again denied entry.
“They said I don't make enough money and people on welfare shouldn't take a vacation,” said Kelley, a single mother who has been on assistance for five years. “I was told that I wouldn't be allowed to cross the border until my life ‘drastically changed.'”
She said she was stunned by the events.
“My son was running around saying ‘I want to go to Canada. I want to go to Canada.' But I had to say, ‘Honey, we can't go to Canada. They won't let us,'” Kelley said. “And I just broke down in tears as I was walking out.”
But it wasn't necessarily the fact that she wasn't let into the country that bothered her - it was because she felt the way she was treated was rude and unfair.
Kelley added that the people she was visiting were going to cover her expenses as well as room and board, so she didn't understand why being on welfare mattered.
Because of the incident, Kelley said she filed a discrimination complaint with the agency Tuesday, but has heard no response yet.
Patrizia Giolti, a spokesperson for the Canada Border Services Agency, said that there are many reasons why a person could be deemed inadmissible to cross the border under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
“Some of the reasons are for security issues. They may have ties to terrorism or organized crime. And financial reasons are another reason,” Giolti said. “A foreign national may be inadmissible for financial reasons if they will be unable to support themselves while they are here in Canada.”
She added that every case, however, is taken on its own merits.
“For privacy issues we do not discuss specific cases,” Giolti said. “I really couldn't speculate what transpired between the traveler and the officer at that time. But each case in unique, and the officer will make a decision based on the information that is presented at that time.”
Marian Kramer, the national chair of the Michigan Welfare Rights Organization - the Detroit-based union of public assistance recipients and low-income workers in the state, said she had never heard of an incident like this.
“And I've been dealing with welfare rights for some 40 years,” she said. “Why should she be discriminated against because she is on public assistance?”
The story of Kelley's rejection has recently made some waves in the Canadian media. The events were reported by the Toronto Sun, and one article stated that “Kelley's plight outraged dozens of Toronto Sun readers who wanted the family to visit Canada after reading about their plight in yesterday's paper. Many readers sent e-mails or called to voice their concerns.”
Also, Kelley said she was called Friday morning by a Toronto radio station, in which she said the DJ's described her as a “celebrity of sorts.” During her time on air, she was asked questions and was even allowed to listen to the callers who gave their opinions.
The new-found attention has been a strange experience, Kelley said.
“I don't like being called ‘welfare mom.' I'm more than that,” Kelly said of the Toronto Sun's headline. “I take care of my kids. When you say ‘welfare,' most people are going to look at it and look down on you. That's just how society is and it's sad.”
- Contact Michael Peterson at 725-5136 extension 223 or mpetersonarguspress@gmail.com. Post comments about this story online at www.argus-press.com.
Comment on this Story
Anne wrote on Jun 5, 2009 11:15 AM:
"Kelley added that the people she was visiting were going to cover her expenses as well as room and board, so she didn't understand why being on welfare mattered."
If she had no proof of this as fact (not just a statement she made to them), they had no way to know if this was just a ploy to get into the country because Michigan was pushing her to get off welfare. I'm not seeing a real case for discrimination here, even if Canada had to answer to a US citizen (welfare mother or otherwise), which they do not. "
Alex Rickson wrote on May 25, 2009 4:20 AM:
Rose Kelley wrote on May 21, 2009 11:10 AM:
Jim the Canadian wrote on May 18, 2009 3:30 PM:
This was before they even asked me what I wanted to do in the US. It just makes sense to ask, and require this type of information.
What next? I'll file a complaint towards the Officers I dealt with when crossing into the US? Be serious. Its their jobs to ask and deny people who do not meet the requirements.
Jim "
A mom wrote on May 17, 2009 2:05 PM:
SSI recipients can visit Canada but not live there and have the US govt send that money there. SS yes not SSI.
Border gaurds in Canada have wide powers far more than American guards do. Go to www.canlii.org a Canadian law site with the cases type immigration disabled child and see what it says.
I had to get what was called a minster permit to enter the country and show my bank my life and even after undergoing an RCMP and FBI background check. "
american dad wrote on May 16, 2009 1:01 AM:
After saying all that, she has NO rights in Canada. Yes, Canada is much like the USA, but it is not the same country. They have their own rules and regulations there and they can allow or disallow whoever they want from entering their country. They don't even have to have a reason either. Yes I am sure she feels she was treated rudely and unfairly. She may have been. SO WHAT. It's their country. They can do what they want on their side of the border. When you are dealing with a bureaucracy like customs and immigration they can be inheritently rude and unfair. Its the nature of the beast, so suck it up buttercup.
If you don't want to go through this again Ms Kelly, do something more with your life. Yes raising two kids alone is hard work. Especially in this economy. Doesn't mean you can't use this time to improve yourself and get ready for better times. There are two kinds of people in this world. Those who bemoan their situation and blame others for it, and those who go out and change their situation. YOU have the choice as to which person you will be. Don't let others chose for you. But it's all up to you as to which person you will be. You have to chose "
Lee wrote on May 15, 2009 3:29 PM:
I teach at a community college, and the vast majority of my students are single mothers with deadbeat baby daddies, working hard to make a better life for their children. So can you. Quit worrying about staunchly defending your mythical right to go to Canada, and use that energy instead to get yourself to the Student Services department of Lansing Community College--you should be in their district. You will not be the first woman to come in with a double-stroller full of kiddies, and you won't be the last. Community colleges have many, many financial aid programs (such as TRiO and SPOPS) for people in your position. They also offer online classes, which would allow you to keep one eye on your children while doing your coursework from whatever computer you're using to post here. LCC even has a Child Care Grant you can apply for if the courses you need aren't available online.
Don't say you can't do it, or have no transportation, or whatever excuse you can think of--my students come from worse circumstances all the time. And I'm in a rural area with far fewer public transportation and child care options than the area you're in. Community colleges exist for one reason, and one reason only: to help people who otherwise might not have a shot at higher ed, or any other way to get out of the downward spiral you're in. You're young, presumably healthy, and you have a community college relatively nearby, just bursting full of resources that you can take advantage of--resources and government money that will help you build a better life, not keep you trapped where you are.
There's no reason NOT to get your butt into college, NOW. Otherwise, you're just going to condemn your children to the same cycle of generational poverty and lack of personal responsibility. And trust me--you don't want to be living this same hand-to-mouth existence when you're 50 or 60. Because as much as it sucks to be poor in your 20s? It's going to be so, so much worse after two or three decades of poverty and age taking a toll on your body. And in the meantime, the only partners you're going to find are the predators who can smell the desperation coming off of you (and all welfare moms) in waves. Step up to the plate and get yourself in a position to support yourself and your kids. That is far more important than anything you'll sightsee in Canada. If your lawyer had any actual ethics or humanity, s/he would tell you the same thing. "
Michael wrote on May 15, 2009 9:27 AM:
Cold North Wind wrote on May 15, 2009 3:20 AM:
Stick to your guns- continue-.The biggest "losers" often are the ones who are quick to judge-harshly. People who live in glass houses,being the first to throw stones !Or- they have more tiome on their handfs- to write nasty things ! Me- retired- worked like a maniac all my life. Survived some serious abuse. So- keep on ! "
sue wrote on May 14, 2009 12:12 PM:
Tay wrote on May 14, 2009 9:21 AM:
fearofretrobution wrote on May 14, 2009 12:42 AM:
You want us to stick with the subject at hand: Your refused entry into the nation of Canada do to your being a recipient of welfare. Fair enough. All I can say about that is this: Canada is a sovereign nation, and as such, has the right to deny entry to any non-citizen at any time. It may or may not be fair in this case, (hard to say since we've only gotten your side of the story) bu that IS the bottom line. Sovergn nation have the right to say who can and cannot come in. Period. "
Michael wrote on May 13, 2009 3:10 PM:
I am sure that Rose Kelley is well aware of the fact that she is jobless, Im sure she is well aware of the fact that she has made poor life choices, Im sure she has regretted those choices to some degree. No one needs to have their entire community pointing out every thing that they have done wrong. Think about it people, how would it feel to have everyone in your city saying that your a horrible person because of stuff you have done. I sure as hell know that i wouldn't. "
Rose Kelley wrote on May 13, 2009 2:46 PM:
Goober wrote on May 13, 2009 1:22 PM:
kids2pets4 wrote on May 13, 2009 12:18 PM:
sue wrote on May 13, 2009 12:15 PM:
Amanda wrote on May 13, 2009 11:52 AM:
T wrote on May 13, 2009 11:41 AM:
Tay wrote on May 13, 2009 11:38 AM:
Les wrote on May 13, 2009 11:01 AM:
Sorry
Les "
WONDERFUL citizen wrote on May 13, 2009 10:56 AM:
First of all, like most of you have said there is more to this story, and as we all know the truth will always come out in the end. For one we have not heard anything pertaining to the facts from the Canadian Border, which goes to show that we have not heard the whole story. So with that, none of us should be judging her let alone supporting her. When you don’t have all the facts you cannot come to any conclusion whether it be judgmental or supportive. Furthermore Ms. Kelley, if you do not want us “Wonderful citizens” poking around in your business you should have never put your business out there for us, you should have just filed your complaint and not made it public knowledge. You think we are poking around, wait until Canadian officials start poking around. They have way more resources than we do. One thing I don’t understand is in your last comment you stated:” Then to be turned away from the only break I have had in over 5 years because I do at least make sure my kids are fed” how is a trip to Canada the ONLY break you have gotten in 5 years? I think your 5 years of welfare would be a break, seeing as to it’s money you don’t have to get up and go to work for. You may not have been getting assistance for 5 consecutive years, for everything, but medical that is something a lot of people who work don’t have, so be grateful. Two last questions, when is the last time you even worked, and out of the last 5 years how much was actually spent working for a paycheck? "
Rose Kelley wrote on May 13, 2009 10:49 AM:
sue wrote on May 13, 2009 10:25 AM:
Alric wrote on May 13, 2009 8:54 AM:
Sometimes I think the best solution is for the U. S. to completely implode, and from the ashes, a saner, more moral nation be built up in its place. "
mich wrote on May 13, 2009 4:59 AM:
fear of retrobution wrote on May 13, 2009 3:16 AM:
five years ago the economy was in much better shape. You couldn't find a job five years ago? The why did you have another child??
I've lived that broke with no help life. It's all about life choices. Let's look at some facts here shall we?
1st, you claim to have been on assistance for 5 years. Ok, fine. Your children are aged five and one. So, you chose to get pregnant at least once, maybe twice, while you were jobless and on state assistance. That is a piss poor life choice.
My wife and I desperately want to have another child. But we're just too strapped for cash right now. So, we're CHOOSING not to have another child now.
Life choices. You Chose to get pregnant before you were even old enough to drink. You chose to get pregnant again while on welfare. Bottom line is, you're life is never gonna get better until you choose to take some personal responsibility for the decisions you've made, and make the appropriate lifestyle changes.
BTW, that, "community of self-absorbed people such as yourselves" I.E. us, have been the one paying your bills for the last five years, so spare us your righteous indignation.
Finally, I sincerely wish you the best of luck. I hope you kind find some work and get your life straightened out. Until then you need to realize that state assistance isn't a right. It's the charity of others. You should be thankful for it. And if your life is really the bad off, you shouldn't be doing anything other than spending your days trying to elevate your position. "
ngrzena wrote on May 13, 2009 1:16 AM:
BH wrote on May 12, 2009 11:00 PM:
Whatever, go back to la la land.
Until this year, Canada hasn't run a budget deficit since the mid 90's. The only reason why they've gone into deficit this year is for the same reason why almost every other country has had to do the same - to kick start the global economy.
Their banks have not had ANY bailouts - none.
They have never sent out any "Stimulus checks".
None of their Provinces or Territories are on the brink of bankruptcy or have had to lay off civil servants in the 1000's.
Because they have a universal medical system does that make it a welfare state? How does that make it a welfare state?
Your ignorance is breathtaking... "
El Burro wrote on May 12, 2009 10:13 PM:
Steve wrote on May 12, 2009 9:35 PM:
Minimum wage was NEVER intended to support a family
Welfare was NOT intended to be a way of life.
So, with that said, she should have never had another child and should have taken advantage of education offered during the first month of her being on welfare. Instead of doing what she did......had another welfare kid. So now CA. will not let you in....TFB! "
AreYouSerious wrote on May 12, 2009 6:55 PM:
Ms. Kelly, most employers will NOT be impressed by you bringing your kids with you to apply for a job. Find someone to watch them for a day or two and go apply for jobs without bringing them along. "
BrockSamson wrote on May 12, 2009 6:20 PM:
Concerned Citizen wrote on May 12, 2009 6:10 PM:
Rose Kelley wrote on May 12, 2009 5:18 PM:
Robert wrote on May 12, 2009 5:14 PM:
shiataxpayer wrote on May 12, 2009 5:08 PM:
Make fishing poles out of a stick, string and a safety pin--and find the nearest creek.
Can the family travel to Port Huron to visit at one of the nice parks there? An all day potluck picnic--granted, not days spent together but it is better than nothing.
You can show your kids something besides poverty by the choices you make. No more siblings, go to college, and show your kids that hard work pays off.
In 5 years you could have earned an associates or bachelors degree with help while on assistance.
We are two full time wage earners here who pay taxes to support you. We haven't went on a vacation in 4 years due to job/pay changes and no money to do so. "
maryfknsunshine wrote on May 12, 2009 4:17 PM:
Southern Neighbor wrote on May 12, 2009 2:45 PM:
Rose Kelley wrote on May 12, 2009 12:33 PM:
Barmakid wrote on May 12, 2009 12:30 PM:
The system that denied her entry to Canada, is closely related to the one that made the rules that enabled this family to enjoy five years of welfare.
You win some; you lose some. C'est la Vie! "
Lee wrote on May 12, 2009 11:09 AM:
GiantSS wrote on May 12, 2009 10:25 AM:
ShadowWolf wrote on May 12, 2009 9:59 AM:
ShadowWolf wrote on May 12, 2009 9:56 AM:
The way our welfare system is set up, we're going to get double what we were paying for food a month...just for food alone... Also, medical for our kids paid for. We can't afford this on our own. I can see why people would live on welfare because you can actually live a life. My kids reactions when I brought home some food from food stamps was this "mmmmmm I forgot how good this tasted". We have not been able to buy quality food consistantly for a long time....even after paying off all our credit cards, etc.
I just want to make people aware that they may not know the whole picture when they see a family on welfare so please be careful about judging in general. We work hard, we want the best for our children and we are trying our hardest to get back on our feet. It is humiliating enough to walk in the office and ask for assistance and then frustrating when you hear people talking about how they lie to get on welfare when you are trying your hardest to be honest. "
a from MI wrote on May 12, 2009 8:03 AM:
bobc wrote on May 12, 2009 7:10 AM:
And that goes for the USA too...we also have laws that need enforced concerning immigration, but the weak spined in D.C. pick & choose what laws need enforced. "
fear of retrobution wrote on May 12, 2009 1:44 AM:
Canada has some of the most comprehensive social help/welfare programs in the world outside of the more liberal European states. Canada IS a welfare state.
It's your self righteous elitist liberal/fascist comments that make the rest of the world believe that we're all a bunch uppity know-it-alls who think our crap doesn't stink. Not surprising that you would come to a socialist coutries defense. "
angeredcitizen wrote on May 11, 2009 11:13 PM:
Please wrote on May 11, 2009 7:35 PM:
jce wrote on May 11, 2009 4:47 PM:
Lee wrote on May 11, 2009 2:45 PM:
Chris wrote on May 11, 2009 2:36 PM:
Larry wrote on May 11, 2009 2:35 PM:
Sara wrote on May 11, 2009 2:08 PM:
Shing wrote on May 11, 2009 1:53 PM:
While I understand that some citizens will need assistance to get on their feet, if a person has spent 5 years on wellfare, then they are not a bad person, just not a very ambitious or hard working one. Bottom line is that this country provides a truck load of methods to continue education if you have no skills for the job market. There are grants, scholarships, and student loan programs out the wazoo for women with children who want to continue their education. In 5 years, this woman could have had a degree if she wanted to. So as a tax payer, no, I'm not real jazzed at the idea of the woman taking a vacation to Canada while I work my full time, my wife works her full time job, and my daughter in college works her part time job, all so my family can get by, my child have her education, and none of us take vacations.
For those Canadians that think this was so unfair for this lady to be denied entrance, I'll be glad to let you sponsor citizenship for her so you can start picking up the tab for her and her childrens' care and feeding instead of me. Just say the word and the forms will be on the way. "
Rose Kelley wrote on May 11, 2009 1:43 PM:
Tom wrote on May 11, 2009 1:07 PM:
B wrote on May 11, 2009 12:36 PM:
Tom Bowman - USA wrote on May 11, 2009 12:14 PM:
Canada will let in who they let in, don't try to visit Canada if you have serious traffic violations either. Can't the Canadian relations visit her in USA ? It does sound like a setup for her to claim refugee status for fear of an abusive relationship at home or some other contrived duress. "
Alex wrote on May 11, 2009 12:10 PM:
Get your crap together Canada and make som common sense decisions. "
Lady wrote on May 11, 2009 11:02 AM:
Dee Dee wrote on May 11, 2009 10:25 AM:
Dont be too quick to judge everyones comments.. FREE SPEECH is still available , until nobama changes that and he is on his way to do so. We need to wait to hear more about this story..SOMETHING just isnt right about it.. So until then , we still have the rights to our opinions, based on what has been published. "
Local Taxpayer wrote on May 11, 2009 10:15 AM:
SRMK999 wrote on May 11, 2009 10:00 AM:
Exodus1 wrote on May 11, 2009 9:48 AM:
Becca wrote on May 11, 2009 8:51 AM:
Tired of Paying wrote on May 11, 2009 8:33 AM:
Canada doesn't want to support you eith.. "
is it really welfare wrote on May 11, 2009 8:19 AM:
Does that make me a welfare mom? No it doesn't. She could work full time and only get assistance with her daycare. We don't know the situation.
Should she win a lawsuit against this country, all monies won, should be redirected to the state. She must pay back what she took. Daycare, cash, food or medical. "
peterj.51 wrote on May 11, 2009 7:01 AM:
or choice. I pray that the young women and the children get the opportunity to break the welfare stigma and life style.
I question the motives of Kelly and her attorney in filing this case and must say
that I would not make this a front page story if I were editor of a "community" newspaper. "
RLS wrote on May 11, 2009 6:57 AM:
In other words, you’re on “public assistance” otherwise known as WELFARE!
By the way, who’s the Brainiac that thinks NAFTA decides what documentation is required at the border?
As for you Canadian’s, who are you to condemn with Canada being the number one entry point for transporting non Mexican illegal aliens, including terrorists, into the United States! "
Mike wrote on May 11, 2009 1:05 AM:
frustrated citizen wrote on May 10, 2009 11:48 PM:
secondly, i am also appalled that the response to this woman has been so harsh.
i am a person receiving assistance and i also have a job, does that also make me a bad person? many of you know that this county is one of the worst in the state. most people dont have the resources to even get to a job these days. so before you judge, think about what you are saying. "
jaline wrote on May 10, 2009 11:46 PM:
BH wrote on May 10, 2009 11:24 PM:
A Canadian was barred entry into the US to look after her terminally ill and alone aunt (a US citizen) for a month because "she was taking an American's job?". There's plenty of stories on both sides of the border. One Canadian was recently pepper sprayed by a US border guard after he asked the guard "say please". The list goes on and on.
Would you see this as reasonable?
“A foreign national may be inadmissible for financial reasons if they will be unable to support themselves while they are here in the United States.”
All I did was replaced "Canada" with "United States" in this paragraph taken from this story. Doesn't seem so far fetched, does it?
Gimme a break - Canada is a separate nation, fully entitled to let whomever in and deny whomever from coming in. Ignorant comments like "a welfare nation like Canada" only reinforce the redneck neo con ignoramus stereotype that unfortunately, a lot of the world sees the US.
PS: As for Canada being the "Mexico" of the north, look again. Canada's G8 performance has consistenly been near the top for many years. "
DEE DEE wrote on May 10, 2009 11:00 PM:
ed mcleod wrote on May 10, 2009 10:33 PM:
Erebus wrote on May 10, 2009 9:29 PM:
tbird59 wrote on May 10, 2009 8:48 PM:
LittleSister wrote on May 10, 2009 6:06 PM:
Upset wrote on May 10, 2009 4:54 PM:
T. wrote on May 10, 2009 4:53 PM:
texasredtop wrote on May 10, 2009 4:24 PM:
Biff Baxter All american wrote on May 10, 2009 2:54 PM:
I hope she loses big time. Welfare isn't a virtue. "
flyonthewall wrote on May 10, 2009 2:24 PM:
too bad wrote on May 10, 2009 1:52 PM:
I have no sympathy for this individual. She obviously has time to go to Canada - not look for a job. She obviously has money - so why does she need welfare (for 5 years no less).
It sounds like she is going for the "easy money"....I guess welfare forms are too hard to fill out!
We work and pay taxes for her to go to Canada??? Does this make sense to anybody??? Canada doesn't want another non-contributing individual. "
politicaldookie wrote on May 10, 2009 11:11 AM:
www.politicaldookie.wordpress.com "
Molly wrote on May 10, 2009 10:41 AM:
Michael wrote on May 10, 2009 9:38 AM:
KP wrote on May 10, 2009 9:31 AM:
Bringing "every piece of paperwork" doesn't help if those pieces don't include 1) Proof of citizenship and identification for yourself and your children 2) Notarized child custody and permission to travel documentation, at the least. "
Eagle Eye wrote on May 10, 2009 8:45 AM:
cynde wrote on May 10, 2009 8:17 AM:
get a job wrote on May 10, 2009 7:28 AM:
Therese wrote on May 10, 2009 7:13 AM:
NObama wrote on May 10, 2009 5:37 AM:
Owosso_lolcat wrote on May 9, 2009 8:45 PM:
Nancy wrote on May 9, 2009 6:27 PM:
Deepockets wrote on May 9, 2009 6:19 PM:
Concerned Citizen wrote on May 9, 2009 6:18 PM:
My prayers are with you. I'm behind you 100%..
Hope you can beat them.. "
fear of retrobution wrote on May 9, 2009 5:21 PM:
BigBrother wrote on May 9, 2009 5:08 PM:
C wrote on May 9, 2009 4:12 PM:
sue wrote on May 9, 2009 12:25 PM:
Betty wrote on Aug 13, 2009 9:12 AM:
5 and almost 7 months old.She works her butt off to make it she is only 28 years old, her man would gladly take any job he can find.Don't go looking for a job with your kids, thats why you have no job, Did they discriminate you because you brought your kids with you every time you filled out a application.
Hello see the picture.I think there is more to this that beats the eye.I think you are wrong to do this, and I think you said in your mind when this happen I am going to file suit against them,But the results at the end of all this will tell. Good Luck.You told everyone your life and now they are acting on it.No one fault but yours.I am sorry you could not go visit in canada but that is their right.I hope you do have a great life with your children they grow up so fast thats what you should be doing and trying to make your life better but instead you are telling everyone your life story.Come on Chick these people are tearing you up. You feel you were violated by canada, and you do have the freedom of speech but don't get upset when people write mean things because you can make your life better only you, and they are just acting on your story.What did you expect,Fight for what you believe if you believe you were discrimated in Canada realized this will get ulgy I just can't imagine this ending up good for you. Good Luck with all this.I will be thinking about you and your kids.My dad told me something before he pass away Your life is what you make of it, If you do not like it, You are the only one who can change it. Take care Rose "