News
Viewing of pornography at libraries causes controversy
Email this story | Print this story
Saturday, May 23, 2009 9:25 PM EDT
OWOSSO - When Catherine Loxen took her granddaughter to the Owosso branch of the Shiawassee District Library in January, she discovered something that is now causing controversy across the county.
Loxen and her 10-year-old granddaughter visited the library after Loxen's computer stopped working. She described the trip this way:
“She went down to the children's part of the library and I went upstairs to the adult area. There are two secluded computers set apart from the others and one was open next to another gentleman so I got on it. When my granddaughter came upstairs to get me, she glanced at the screen of the man. As we walked out to leave, she tugged my arm and said, ‘Grandma, I looked at that man's screen and there were pictures of naked women on the screen.'”
Loxen said she was shocked to find out that the branch allowed unrestricted Internet access - including access to adult Web sites.
Section 6 of the Michigan Library Privacy Act requires public libraries to either filter all of their public Internet computers, except at least one for use by adult - 18 years of age or older - patrons, or to adopt and implement policies that prevent minors - under 18 years of age - from accessing sexually explicit materials on the Internet.
The Shiawassee District Library prevents all minors from accessing adult content.
Shiawassee District Library Director Steven Flayer said he is aware of the issue and the library board will discuss it at its meeting at 7 p.m. Wednesday.
“It's not as widespread as some people believe,” Flayer said. “We've addressed the issue and we've made changes.”
Flayer said the library sectioned off only two computers at the Owosso branch and that they offer privacy screens that limit the range of peripheral viewing. He said the computers also are not near bookshelves so that few people would walk behind them.
“We also don't allow children in areas without adult supervision,” Flayer said. “We also have someone monitoring children and adult usage during most hours.”
While no law requires filtering, Flayer said the Shiawassee District Library has looked into Web content filters as a solution, and came up with several problems.
“One problem is that if anyone over age 18 requests that the filters be turned off, we have to turn them off,” he said. “Another problem is that filters are not 100-percent effective, and that some words that are not problematic are blocked, and others that are questionable are not.”
Flayer said there is also a fear of a lawsuit for impeding free speech.
“We can come up with any rule we want, but whether or not it will hold up in court, that's to be determined,” he said. “This is a problem that occurs in most libraries.”
Corunna/Caledonia library technician Cathy Cramer said the library has successfully used filtering software for a few years.
“It does a pretty good job of blocking the adult sites, but we also monitor activity just in case,” she said.
Loxen recently brought her story to the attention of the Owosso City Council and it received immediate attention.
“I can't believe this,” Councilman Ben Frederick said. “It's appalling to think that there are tax dollars being used to subsidize this type of activity.”
Mayor Mike Bruff said the city has no control or affiliation with the Shiawassee District Library but that the issue would not go unnoticed.
Loxen said she plans to pursue the issue further and will attend the Shiawassee District Library meeting Wednesday night.
- Contact Nathan Bruttell at 725-5136 extension 231 or nbruttellarguspress@gmail.com. Post comments about this story online at www.argus-press.com.
Comment on this Story
Al wrote on May 27, 2009 5:38 PM:
“I can't believe this,” Councilman Ben Frederick said. “It's appalling to think that there are tax dollars being used to subsidize this type of activity.”
You're appalled and can't believe THIS?? You'd have a stroke if you knew everything your kids are exposed to, courtesy of your tax dollars. Think prescribed medication. "
Al wrote on May 27, 2009 5:28 PM:
That sarcatically said, someone who, when they get a case of the hornies, thinks "PUBLIC LIBRARY", needs to be locked up and the key needs to be thrown away.
P.S.: When I attempted to submit my comment, the Argus website kicked it back to me. "Your name and/or comment contains inappropriate words, such as "p_rn". Please edit your message and then resubmit."
I changed the o's to zeros in certain word. If you're reading this it was accepted by the Argus "evil word filter".
Thanks Argus for helping keep our children safe from adult material at the library AND for keeping them safe from seeing a "p" and an "rn" with an "o" in between. "
Concerned Owosso Residence wrote on May 27, 2009 2:08 PM:
DaleS wrote on May 26, 2009 5:25 PM:
ShiCoMom wrote on May 26, 2009 5:21 PM:
And what about people, men or women, who need to do very important research on breast cancer or another sensitive health subject? Do we limit their freedom to seek information on topics that impact their lives? If there's an image of a breast on a computer screen, is that pornography?
If you are in a library and witness someone browsing at a site that offends you - talk to the librarian and have them do their job. They have the training to quietly and effectively deal with web surfers viewing offensive sites. If the person refuses, they can be banned or suspended from the library.
Libraries are public places - we need to remember that. They are not schools or daycares and librarians are not teachers or parents. If we all work together we can limit the impact of this unsavory behavior. Raising a big brouhaha and insulting the library and library staff isn't helping. Of course libraries are not defending the rights of perverts - they are defending all of our rights to information. Frankly, I'm more concerned about the Cialis and Viagra commercials on network television. "
mspencer wrote on May 26, 2009 3:54 PM:
raymill231 wrote on May 26, 2009 3:37 PM:
parent of teen wrote on May 26, 2009 12:05 PM:
Ronald J. DeHaas wrote on May 25, 2009 11:16 PM:
As President of Covenant Eyes, Inc., an Owosso company that provides the best Internet filtering and accountability software in the world, I commend your paper for highlighting the pornography at our public library.
There are a few miss-statements and misconceptions in the article, however.
First, your article states that “Section 6 of the Michigan Library Privacy Act requires public libraries to either filter all of their public Internet computers, except at least one for use by adult… patrons, or to adopt and implement policies that prevent minors… from accessing sexually explicit materials on the Internet.” That is close, but not accurate, and the difference is important (and especially pertinent to Loxen’s granddaughter). The law (viewable at http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(12x0r1mtqklyrluospqxpz55))/mileg.aspx?page=getobject&objectName=mcl-397-606) states that the second choice is “utilizing a system or method that is designed to prevent a minor from viewing obscene matter or sexually explicit matter that is harmful to minors.” The difference between “accessing” and “viewing” is the important point. The law allows, and in fact requires libraries to prevent minors from viewing such material… which obviously our library is unable to do. In that case, the law is indeed open enough that it allows the library to filter ALL computers from such material.
The Nottawa Township Library of Centreville, Michigan, has an excellent policy that uses this liberty: Nottawa Township Library, in compliance with section 6 of the Michigan Library Privacy Act, 1982 PA 455, MCL 397.606 and the Federal Children Library Protection Act of 2000, has chosen to filter all public access computers. These Acts require all public libraries to adopt and enforce policies restricting access of minors to obscene matter or sexually explicit materials. Our library is concerned in particular with the well being of children and wishes to protect them from obscenity, pornography, and materials that could be construed as harmful. Children between the ages of 14 to 18 must have a permission form signed by a parent or guardian, and on file at the library, before they can access the Internet. The Library staff will issue an Internet Use card to this age group… Nottawa Township Library reserves the right to end an Internet session, or deny access to computer or Internet use, if the library staff believes inappropriate use has occurred. This behavior would include but is not limited to: misrepresenting oneself as someone else, seeking unauthorized access to passwords or data belonging to others, making unauthorized copies of copyrighted or licensed software or data, sending, receiving, or displaying text or graphics which may be reasonably construed as obscene.
(http://www.nottawatownshiplibrary.com/public_internet_policy.htm)
A second point from your article is the statement by Library Director Steven Flayer, “It’s not as widespread as some people believe.” This is a naïve statement in light of statistics which show that the average age of exposure to pornography for males is 8 years old! And without software to monitor usage of the Internet, how does he even know how widespread it is? It is obviously enough of a problem that all of the library workers with whom I have talked (past and present) say it is a very serious problem.
Thirdly, your article says that “While no law requires filtering, Flayer said that the … Liberay has looked into web content filters… and came up with several problems… One problem is that if anyone over age 18 requests that the filters be turned off, we have to turn them off.” Flayer obviously has not read the law. There absolutely is nothing on the books that requires a library to allow access to pornography… that is a fallacy.
Next, Flayer says, “Another problem is that filters are not 100 percent effective.” Wow! According to that logic, since kids can get alcohol and cigarettes anyway, we shouldn’t have laws restricting their use. And, he obviously has not tried Covenant Eyes’ filter. Covenant Eyes has an age-based sensitivity setting that allows different access for different ages, but blocks pornography for all sensitivity settings.
And finally, Flayer said there is “also a fear of a lawsuit for impeding free speech.” What fear when it would be in compliance with the requirements of the law?
Readers should also be aware of a bill that is pending, House Bill 4833, introduced April 28 by Rep. McMillen. That bill would amend the Library Privacy Act to require that all libraries use a filter that “blocks or restricts receipt of visual depictions that are obscene, child pornography, or harmful to minors. The library may disable the blocking or filtering software for use by a person 18 years of age or older to enable access for bona fide research or other lawful purposes.”
It is about time this community stands up to eliminate pornography from our library. Thank you to the Argus-Press for bringing this issue to the forefront!
Sincerely,
Ronald J. DeHaas
President, Covenant Eyes, Inc. "
Marianne Stuart wrote on May 25, 2009 1:25 PM:
I read your story with interest. I had my children participate for the first time in the Summer Reading Program three years ago. We were in the children's library to do their reporting when my eight year old son came to me to tell me that two boys were looking at naked women on their computer. The children's computers are in a very visible area and anyone walking by could easily have seen what my son did. My son and I were upset and my family left immediately. My husband contacted Ken Uptigrove who said that the computers are supposed to be monitored by the librarians. It was very disturbing to me to have my son exposed to pornography when I was just trying to give him a love for reading. Mr. Uptigrove didn't seem to take the situation very seriously. I don't understand why the children's computers don't have filters. There is absolutely no reason that they need to be able to view this stuff.
Thank you for the article. Do you know if the children's computers now have filters? "
Anne wrote on May 25, 2009 9:51 AM:
(P.S. to the Library... technically the jury is still out on internet right to free speech, you are probably safe in limiting at this stage.) "
X DISTRICT LIBRARY USER wrote on May 25, 2009 6:41 AM:
Corunna is cleaner, friendler and the people nice. The books and people in Owosso are outdated. "
Durand Dad wrote on May 29, 2009 2:46 AM: